Are Health Insurance Companies Making Unreasonable Profits?

Understanding the Profit Margin of Private Health Insurers

Growing profits

Virojt Changyencham / Getty Images

One of the common criticisms leveled at private health insurance companies is that they are profiting at the expense of sick people. But let's take a closer look at the data and see where it takes us. Do private health insurance companies really make unreasonable profits?

How Common Is Private Health Insurance?

Before addressing the question about profits, it's important to look at how common having private health insurance really is in the United States. In other words, how many people might be affected by this question.

According to Kaiser Family Foundation data, roughly a third of Americans had public health insurance in 2018 (mostly Medicare and Medicaid). Another 9 percent were uninsured, but the rest had private health insurance that they either purchased on their own in the individual market (6 percent) or coverage provided by an employer (49 percent). Nearly half of Americans have coverage provided by an employer, although 60 percent of them have coverage that's partially or fully self-funded by the employer (that means the employer has its own fund for covering medical costs, rather than purchasing coverage from a health insurance carrier; in most cases, the employer contracts with a commercial insurance company to administer the benefits—so the enrollees might have plan ID cards that say Humana or Anthem, for example—but it's the employer's money that's being used to pay the claims, as opposed to the insurance company's money).

But many Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries also have coverage that's provided via a private health insurance company, despite the fact that they are enrolled in publicly-funded health care plans. Thirty-three percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans run by private health insurance carriers. Thirty-nine states have Medicaid managed care contracts with private carriers to cover some or all of their Medicaid enrollees. Even among Original Medicare beneficiaries, a quarter have Medigap plans purchased from private health insurance carriers and this number is increasing (it increased 2 percent from 2016 to 2017 alone).

When we put all that together, it's clear that a significant number of Americans have health coverage that's provided or managed by a private health insurance company. And private health insurance companies tend to get a bad rap when it comes to healthcare costs.

Are Insurer Profits Unreasonable?

Numerous articles have been written by people attempting to find coverage during periods of open enrollment. Some of these appear to conflate revenue with profits which adds to the confusion. Of course, major health insurance carriers have significant revenue, given that they're collecting premiums from so many insureds.

But regardless of how much revenue carriers collect in premiums, they're required to spend most of it on medical claims and health care quality improvements. And although a common criticism is that health insurance companies pay their CEOs too much, that's more reflective of the fact that CEO salary growth, in general, has far outpaced overall wage growth over the past several decades. There are no health insurance carriers represented among the 40 firms with the highest-paid CEOs, although there are several pharmaceutical companies.

So while a seven or eight-figure CEO salary seems absurd to the average worker, it's certainly in line with the corporate norm. And health insurance company CEOs are not among the highest paid CEOs of large companies. The fact remains that salaries are part of the administrative costs that health insurance companies are required to limit under the Affordable Care Act's medical loss ratio (MLR) rules. And so are profits.

Under the MLR rules, insurers that sell individual and small group health insurance coverage must spend at least 80 percent of premiums on medical claims and quality improvements for members. No more than 20 percent of premium revenue can be spent on total administrative costs, including profits and salaries. And for insurers that sell large group coverage, the minimum MLR threshold is 85 percent. Insurers that fail to meet these guidelines (ie, they spend more than the allowed percentage on administrative costs, for whatever reason) are required to send rebates to their members. From 2012 to 2019, under the MLR rule implementation, insurers rebated $5.3 billion to consumers.

How Much Do Health Insurers Profit?

If we look at average profit margins by industry, health insurance companies are in the single digits. For perspective, the legal, real estate, and bookkeeping industries have average profit margins in excess of 17 percent. As far as health care goes, there are certainly some very profitable sectors, including medical and diagnostic laboratories and the pharmaceutical industry. The Government Accounting Office shows the profit margins over 15 percent from 2006 to 2015.

But health insurance doesn't have the sort of profitability those industry segments are able to generate—partly because health insurance is much more regulated. As described above, the ACA effectively limits the profits insurers can generate, by capping total administrative costs (including profit) as a percentage of revenue. But there's no similar requirement for hospitals, device manufacturers, or drug manufacturers.

Bottom Line on Profits for Private Insurance Companies: Reasonable or Unreasonable?

Health care costs are the driving factor behind health insurance premiums. It's true that private health insurance companies pay their CEOs competitive salaries and they must remain profitable in order to stay in business. But their profits are modest when compared with many other industries.

There is certainly a valid argument in favor of removing the profit motive from health care altogether, which is fueling the surge in support for single payer in the U.S. Proponents of a single payer system generally contend that health care is inherently different from other industries, and should not be profit-driven. On the other hand, supporters of a profit-based health care system believe that profit is essential for encouraging innovation and quality improvements.

Currently, health insurers are the only segment of the health care industry in which profits are directly curtailed. In the rest of the industry (ie, hospitals, device manufacturers, pharmaceuticals, etc.), a more free-market approach is taken. There is certainly an argument to be made for eliminating or further curtailing the profits generated in the health insurance industry, but there is a similar argument for reducing or eliminating profits in health care in general.

If you have further questions after reading about profits, learn about the best resources for finding information about health insurance and health policy.

Was this page helpful?
Article Sources
Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Kaiser Family Foundation. Health insurance coverage of the total population.

  2. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2017 employer health benefits survey, Section 10, plan funding. Updated September 19, 2017.

  3. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicare Advantage 2018 data spotlight: First look. Updated October 13, 2017.

  4. Kaiser Family Foundation. Total Medicaid MCO enrollment.

  5. AFL-CIO. Highest-paid CEOs.

  6. Norris L. Billions in ACA rebates show 80/20 Rule’s impact. Updated Octboer 10, 2019.

  7. Biery M. These industries generate the highest profit margins. Forbes. Updated September 6, 2015.

  8. U.S. Government Accounting Office. Drug industry: Profits, research and development spending, and merger and acquisition deals. GAO-18-40. Updated December 19, 2017.