Sexual Health STIs Diagnosis How Mycoplasma Genitalium Is Diagnosed By Elizabeth Boskey, PhD Elizabeth Boskey, PhD Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Elizabeth Boskey, PhD, MPH, CHES, is a social worker, adjunct lecturer, and expert writer in the field of sexually transmitted diseases. Learn about our editorial process Updated on December 27, 2020 Medically reviewed by Matthew Wosnitzer, MD Medically reviewed by Matthew Wosnitzer, MD LinkedIn Twitter Matthew Wosnitzer, MD, is board-certified in urology. He is an attending physician at Yale New Haven Health System, Northeast Medical Group and teaches at the Frank Netter School of Medicine. Learn about our Medical Expert Board Print Kateryna Kon / Science Photo Library / Getty Images Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is a lesser-known but otherwise common sexually transmitted disease (STD). Despite this, few medical professionals ever screen for the disease and instead assume that MG is involved in certain circumstances. For example, if you have symptoms of urethritis or cervicitis but test negative for gonorrhea and chlamydia, your healthcare provider may presumptively treat you for MG. This is because MG is the most common cause of urethritis and cervicitis next to the other two, more familiar diseases. In fact, around one of every 100 adults is thought to have MG, while more than three of every 100 gay or bisexual men are believed to be infected, according to a 2018 study published in Sexually Transmitted Infections. There are times, however, when it is necessary to pinpoint mycoplasma as the cause, and it's not always a straightforward task. Self Checks Because of its frequency in adult populations, MG is almost presumed to be the cause of urethritis (inflammation of the urethra) or cervicitis (inflammation of the cervix) when gonorrhea and chlamydia have been excluded. This is due in part to the fact that MG can be spread so easily, often through sexual touching or rubbing rather than through intercourse. Moreover, MG is not always symptomatic, so you may not even know if you have it or can potentially spread the infection to others. If symptoms do develop, they can vary significantly by sex. In women, the symptoms may include: Vaginal sexPain during sexBleeding after sexSpotting between periodsPain in the pelvic area just below the navel In men, the symptoms include: Watery discharge from the penisBurning, stinging, or pain when urinating While symptoms alone cannot diagnose MG, ones like these are a strong indication that some sort of infection has occurred. It is vital, therefore, to seek a proper diagnosis, especially in women. If left untreated, MG can lead to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), a condition that can interfere with your ability to get pregnant. It is unknown whether untreated MG may also interfere with male fertility. Labs and Tests There are challenges to diagnosing MG given the lack of an FDA-approved test. Still, it may be important to isolate MG as the cause, particularly if urethritis or cervicitis is recurrent and fails to respond to antibiotic therapy. This is of concern given that that antibiotic-resistance MG is believed to be building in North America, according to a 2017 study from the Public Health Agency of Canada. Isolating MG as the cause can aid in the selection of the most appropriate antibiotic and exclude those more closely linked to resistance (such as macrolides like azithromycin and fluoroquinolones like ciprofloxacin). If MG testing is indicated, an assay known as the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is the preferred method of diagnosis. It can be used to test urine, endometrial biopsies, and urethral, vaginal, and cervical swab. The NAAT tests for the genetic material of MG rather than trying to grow the bacteria in a culture (something that is next to impossible to do). It is not only accurate but fast, usually returning a result in 24 to 48 hours. (The NAAT is also considered the gold standard method of testing for chlamydia.) The NAAT employs a technology called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in which the genetic material of an organism is amplified—essentially photocopied again and again—to facilitate accurate detection. The NAAT is not without its challenges. Unless performed correctly, the test may return a false-negative result. To overcome this, the provider should ideally take a urine sample as well as a swab of the urethra, vagina, or cervix. This essentially doubles the risk of a correct diagnosis and helps overcome errors in sample collection. Differential Diagnoses If an inconclusive or borderline result is returned, the healthcare provider may perform a repeat NAAT and/or broaden the scope of the investigation. Presuming that chlamydia and gonorrhea have already been ruled out, the investigation (known as differential diagnosis) may include: Bacterial vaginosisE. coli cystitisHerpes simplex virus (HSV) urethritisProstatitisSalpingitis (inflammation of the fallopian tubes)SyphilisTrichomonas vaginalisUreaplasma urealyticum (a genital tract bacterial infection)Urethral abscess Some of these, like syphilis and bacterial vaginosis, are more likely to have been investigated prior to MG. The others may only be performed once the more likely causes of urethritis and cervicitis have been ruled out. 4 Sources Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Ona S, Molina RL, Diouf K. Mycoplasma genitalium: An overlooked sexually transmitted pathogen in women?. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:4513089. doi:10.1155/2016/4513089 Wiesenfeld HC, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium in women: current knowledge and research priorities for this recently emerged pathogen. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_2):S389-S395. doi:10.1093/infdis/jix198 Horner PJ, Martin DH. Mycoplasma genitalium infection in men. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_2):S396-S405. doi:10.1093/infdis/jix145 Haggerty CL, Taylor BD. Mycoplasma genitalium: an emerging cause of pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:959816. doi:10.1155/2011/959816 Additional Reading Baumann, L.; Cina, M.; Egli-Gany, D. et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transmitted Infect, 2018;94:255-62. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053384. Coorevits, L.; Traen, A. Bingé, L. et al. Identifying a consensus sample type to test for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, Trichomonas vaginalism and human papillomavirus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Mar 17.pii: S1198-743X(18)30223-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.013. Gratrix, J.; Plitt, S.; Turnbull, L. et al. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Mycoplasma genitalium among STI clinic attendees in Western Canada: a cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016300. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016300. Tagg, K.; Jeoffreys, N.; Couldwell, D. et al. Fluoroquinolone and Macrolide Resistance-Associated Mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(7):2245-2249. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00495-13, By Elizabeth Boskey, PhD Elizabeth Boskey, PhD, MPH, CHES, is a social worker, adjunct lecturer, and expert writer in the field of sexually transmitted diseases. See Our Editorial Process Meet Our Medical Expert Board Share Feedback Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! What is your feedback? Other Helpful Report an Error Submit