Heart Health Heart Disease Treatment Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Complications By Richard N. Fogoros, MD Richard N. Fogoros, MD Facebook LinkedIn Richard N. Fogoros, MD, is a retired professor of medicine and board-certified internal medicine physician and cardiologist. Learn about our editorial process Updated on March 29, 2020 Medically reviewed by Yasmine S. Ali, MD, MSCI Medically reviewed by Yasmine S. Ali, MD, MSCI Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Yasmine S. Ali, MD, MSCI, is a board-certified preventive cardiologist and lipidologist. Dr. Ali is also an award-winning writer. Learn about our Medical Expert Board Print Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are pacemaker-like devices that continuously monitor your heart rhythm, and, if a life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia occurs, will automatically deliver lifesaving treatment. They are commonly used in people who have a high risk of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. ICDs are extremely effective and generally quite safe. Still, it is possible for you to experience complications with your ICD system. These ICD complications fall into two general types: surgical complications, and post-surgical complications. Callista Images / Getty Images Surgical Complications The surgery to implant an ICD is pretty routine and straightforward, and can usually be done without any problems. However, surgical complications do sometimes occur. The main risks related to ICD implantation surgery include: bleeding infection pneumothorax damage to the heart or to a blood vessel The overall risk of having any of these complications is around 2 to 3%, and most of the time any surgical complications that do occur are minor and can be easily treated. The risk of actually dying from an ICD implantation procedure is very low — well below 1%. Infections, which can occur in up to 1-2% of ICD surgeries, do present a difficult management problem. If the ICD system becomes infected, then the entire ICD system (the ICD generator and all the leads) usually must be removed in order to successfully cure the infection with antibiotics — and once the infection is cleared up, another ICD system will need to be implanted. You will be exposed to these same surgical risks each time your ICD generator needs to be replaced (roughly every 6 to 10 years, when the battery begins to wear out). Your risk from this replacement surgery is generally lower than for the initial surgery. This is because the replacement surgery usually requires only replacement of the ICD generator itself, and not the ICD leads, which reduces to nearly zero the risk of pneumothorax, and of damage to the heart or blood vessels. However, there is some evidence that the risk of infection is a bit higher with replacement surgery than with the initial surgery. Complications That Can Occur After Surgery Once you are past the surgical implantation of an ICD and are completely healed, you should expect to be able to return to your normal life. However, there is still a small risk of developing post-surgical complications. Post-surgical complications of ICD therapy include: Lead complications, such as lead "dislodgement"(movement of the leads out of their proper position) or lead fracture. A malfunctioning lead can cause the loss of effectiveness of the ICD system, or inappropriate shocks (see below).Movement of the ICD generator out of its proper position, which can cause pain, skin erosion or bleeding.Inappropriate shocks, which cause pain, and can produce psychological trauma.ICD malfunction. The most common of these complications are inappropriate shocks, that is, shocks delivered by the ICD because the device “thinks” a life-treating arrhythmia is occurring when actually it is not. ICD shocks are not particularly dangerous, but they hurt. While the shocks are designed to be delivered only when a life-threatening arrhythmia occurs, about 20% of people with ICDs at one time or another will receive shocks for other reasons. These inappropriate shocks can be caused by any very rapid heart rhythm such as atrial fibrillation, or by the rapid heart rate that you get from strenuous exercise. Preventing further inappropriate shocks depends on what is causing them. If an inappropriate shock occurs due to atrial fibrillation or exercise, in most cases the doctor can "re-program" the ICD to reduce the chance of further inappropriate shocks. But sometimes inappropriate shocks can happen because one of the leads has become loose or has developed a tiny fracture. Preventing inappropriate shocks caused by an ICD lead problem usually requires a surgical procedure. Finally, because ICDs are complex electronic devices that contain numerous essential (and delicate) components, sometimes one of these components can fail to operate normally. If this happens, the ICD may not be able to deliver therapy when it is needed, or it may deliver inappropriate shocks. An ICD that fails to function normally almost always needs to be removed and replaced with a new device. In the effort to reduce complications that sometimes occur with standard ICDs, subcutaneous ICDs have been developed recently. These devices are implanted under the skin in the chest area, and entirely avoid having to place leads within blood vessels. This avoids any complications related to the heart and blood vessels that sometimes occur with a standard ICD. While subcutaneous ICDs have their own set of problems, early experience suggests that the incidence of dangerous complications may be reduced with these devices. Fortunately, the large majority of people who have ICDs never experience any serious complications with their devices. The idea of receiving an ICD is simply to protect you from dangerous arrhythmias; it is not meant to drastically change your life. A Word From Verywell While implantable defibrillators are generally very safe and effective, it is important to know what kinds of complications they can produce. Most complications can be managed successfully, as long as they are addressed appropriately. 10 Sources Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Gul EE, Baranchuk A, Brüggemann B, et al. [Pacemaker and ICD electrocardiograms]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2019;30(1):11-23. doi:10.1007/s00399-019-0610-6 Brouwer TF, Driessen AHG, Olde nordkamp LRA, et al. Surgical Management of Implantation-Related Complications of the Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(1):89-96. doi:10.1016/j.jacep.2015.09.011 Carrión-Camacho MR, Marín-León I, Molina-Doñoro JM, González-López JR. Safety of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: A Prospective Study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(1):35. Published 2019 Jan 1. doi:10.3390/jcm8010035 Tarakji KG, Ellis CR, Defaye P, Kennergren C. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(1):65–71. doi:10.15420/aer.2015.27.2 Ezzat VA, Lee V, Ahsan S, et al. A systematic review of ICD complications in randomised controlled trials versus registries: is our 'real-world' data an underestimation?. Open Heart. 2015;2(1):e000198. Published 2015 Feb 17. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000198 Health Quality Ontario . Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 18(7):1–199. Li A, Kaura A, Sunderland N, Dhillon PS, Scott PA The Significance of Shocks in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Recipients. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(2):110–116. doi:10.15420/AER.2016.12.2 Bradfield J, Tung R, Boyle NG, Shivkumar K. Managing patients with ICD shocks and programming tachycardia therapies during acute heart failure syndromes. Heart Fail Rev. 2011;16(5):449–456. doi:10.1007/s10741-011-9241-7 Bettin M, Reinke F, Rath B, Köbe J, Eckardt L. Recent advances in the entirely subcutaneous ICD System. F1000Prime Rep. 2015;7:46. Published 2015 Apr 2. doi:10.12703/P7-46 Linder J, Hidayatallah N, Stolerman M, et al. Perceptions of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A qualitative study of families with a history of sudden life-threatening cardiac events and recommendations to improve care. Einstein J Biol Med. 2013;29(1-2):3–14. doi:10.23861/ejbm20132929 Additional Reading Daubert JP, Zareba W, Cannom DS, et al. Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Shocks In Madit Ii: Frequency, Mechanisms, Predictors, And Survival Impact. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51:1357. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.073 Hawkins NM, Grubisic M, Andrade JG, et al. Long-Term Complications, Reoperations And Survival Following Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implant. Heart 2018; 104:237. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311638 Ranasinghe I, Parzynski CS, Freeman JV, et al. Long-Term Risk For Device-Related Complications And Reoperations After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: An Observational Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2016. doi:10.7326/M15-2732 By Richard N. Fogoros, MD Richard N. Fogoros, MD, is a retired professor of medicine and board-certified in internal medicine, clinical cardiology, and clinical electrophysiology. See Our Editorial Process Meet Our Medical Expert Board Share Feedback Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! What is your feedback? Other Helpful Report an Error Submit