Arthritis Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Early, Aggressive Treatment Best for All RA Patients? By Carol Eustice Carol Eustice Facebook Carol Eustice is a writer covering arthritis and chronic illness, who herself has been diagnosed with both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Learn about our editorial process Updated on September 22, 2021 Medically reviewed by Anita C. Chandrasekaran, MD, MPH Medically reviewed by Anita C. Chandrasekaran, MD, MPH LinkedIn Anita Chandrasekaran, MD, MPH, is board-certified in internal medicine and rheumatology and currently works as a rheumatologist at Hartford Healthcare Medical Group in Connecticut. Learn about our Medical Expert Board Print Table of Contents View All Table of Contents Window of Opportunity Impact of an Aggressive Approach Prescription Drug Options When to Adjust Your Plan Many years ago, a conservative treatment approach for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the norm. Over the years, however, healthcare providers switched to favoring an early and aggressive one as it became more and more apparent that the sooner RA treatment starts, the better the long-term outcomes. This altered approach has improved the outcomes and life expectancies of people with this disease. In fact, studies show that modern treatments, given early on, prevent irreversible joint damage in up to 90% of people with RA. Window of Opportunity Multiple studies show that RA treatment has the greatest impact on disease progression when it's started within a specific time frame—a period often referred to as "the window of opportunity." In the 1990s, healthcare providers believed the optimal window to start treatment with biologics was within the first two years after diagnosis. Now, conventional medical wisdom is that it's better to start even earlier whenever possible. This includes adopting an aggressive approach for undifferentiated arthritis—a diagnosis that often precedes an RA diagnosis—with the hope of preventing its progression to full-blown RA. Starting treatment then can give you your best shot at rheumatoid arthritis remission or at least slower disease progression and better long-term joint function. The more researchers have studied this phenomenon, the more they've narrowed the window on the optimal time frame. Impact of an Aggressive Approach In the past, a significant percentage of people with RA became disabled, so healthcare providers wanted to find ways to improve the prognosis and keep people more functional. Research and clinical evidence has shown that early diagnosis and treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and/or biologics offers the best chance of preventing permanent joint damage later on. These medications also lower your risk of disability and mortality associated with the disease. According to research published in 2018, each person with RA has a 15% increased chance of dying early due to the disease, its complications, or those related to treatment. That number dropped significantly after 2006, likely due to improved treatment options. Prescription Drug Options Typically, if you're at low risk for joint damage from RA, you'll be treated with older DMARD medications that are thought to have a low potential for side effects, including: Plaquenil (hydroxychloroquine) Azulfidine (sulfasalazine) Minocin (minocycline, an antibiotic that has shown benefit in RA but is not approved for this use) Medications used for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis come from several drug classes, and new drugs are always in the pipeline. DMARDs DMARDs are most often the first drug healthcare providers prescribe for RA. If you don't tolerate them or they're not improving your condition enough, your practitioner may switch you to a biologic or JAK inhibitor, or they may keep you on the DMARD and add other medications. Common DMARDs include: Rheumatrex, Trexall (methotrexate) Arava (leflunomide) Imuran (azathioprine) Glucocorticoids are sometimes prescribed to help alleviate pain and inflammation while a DMARD takes time to start working. The American College of Rheumatology’s 2021 guidelines recommend using the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration possible and discourage more than three months of glucocorticoid use when starting a conventional DMARD. Methotrexate The American College of Rheumatology's updated RA treatment guidelines recommend treating newly diagnosed people with moderate-to-high disease activity with methotrexate alone as the first-line treatment. Biologics Biologic drugs are derived from living cells. Several biologics on the market are: Enbrel (etanercept) Humira (adalimumab) Simponi (golimumab) Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Actemra (tocilizumab) Orencia (abatacept) Remicade (infliximab) Rituxan (rituximab) JAK Inhibitors JAK inhibitors block the action of Janus kinase enzymes, which are involved in the autoimmune response and inflammation seen in RA. This is a new and growing drug class that includes medications such as: Xeljanz (tofacitinib) Olumiant (baricitinib) Jakafi (ruxolitinib) Rinvoq (upadacitinib) The corticosteroid prednisone, in low doses, may also have some disease-modifying benefit. Rheumatoid Arthritis Drugs Signs Your Treatment Plan May Need a Change When rheumatoid arthritis isn't properly treated, it can lead to permanent joint damage and disability. You and your healthcare provider should keep an eye out for signs and symptoms of joint damage. Identifying them early can help you reevaluate your treatment plan before the damage worsens. These include: Joint swelling Prolonged morning stiffness Onset of rheumatoid arthritis at a younger age Very high CCP antibody Very high rheumatoid factor Rheumatoid nodules Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and sedimentation rate Abnormalities on X-rays It's not always possible to predict who will develop joint damage. Joint Counts for Assessing RA What About Juvenile RA? Adult RA and juvenile RA are similar but different enough that the childhood form is now most often called juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).A "window of opportunity" for preventing early JIA from becoming chronic may exist, possibly within the first two years of symptom onset. However, researchers are still trying to confirm this window and, if it does exist, which cases would likely benefit from early, aggressive treatment. A Word From Verywell If you got a quick RA diagnosis and are able to start aggressive treatment soon, the prognosis has never been better. Unfortunately for some, RA diagnosis can take time, and aggressive treatments may need to be delayed for various other health reasons. If this sounds like you and you've missed the window of opportunity described here, know that proper medical guidance and an ever-increasing number of drug options may still be able to reduce your symptoms and improve your quality of life. It may even halt disease progression or support remission. RA and Your Prognosis 11 Sources Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: A review. JAMA. 2018;320(13):1360-1372. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13103 van Nies JA, Tsonaka R, Gaujoux-Viala C, Fautrel B, van der Helm-van Mil AH. Evaluating relationships between symptom duration and persistence of rheumatoid arthritis: does a window of opportunity exist? Results on the Leiden early arthritis clinic and ESPOIR cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(5):806-812. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206047 Burgers LE, Raza K, van der Helm-van Mil AH. Window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis - definitions and supporting evidence: from old to new perspectives. RMD Open. 2019;5(1):e000870. Published 2019 Apr 3. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000870 Lopez-Olivo MA, Kakpovbia-Eshareturi V, des Bordes JK, Barbo A, Christensen R, Suarez-Almazor ME. Treating early undifferentiated arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct and indirect trial evidence. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70(9):1355-1365. doi:10.1002/acr.23474 Kyburz D, Finckh A. The importance of early treatment for the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2013;143:w13865. Published 2013 Sep 19. doi:10.4414/smw.2013.13865 Listing J, Kekow J, Manger B, et al. Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of disease activity, treatment with glucocorticoids, TNFα inhibitors and rituximab. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(2):415-421. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204021 Abhishek A, Nakafero G, Kuo CF, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis and excess mortality: down but not out. A primary care cohort study using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(6):977-981. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/key013 Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(7):924-939. doi:10.1002/acr.24596 Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center. Rheumatoid arthritis signs and symptoms. Nigrovic PA. Review: is there a window of opportunity for treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis?. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(6):1405-1413. doi:10.1002/art.38615 Minden K, Horneff G, Niewerth M, et al. Time of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug start in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and the likelihood of a drug-free remission in young adulthood. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71(4):471-481. doi:10.1002/acr.23709 Additional Reading Cleveland Clinic. Rheumatoid arthritis: How to treat. Raza K, Filer A. The therapeutic window of opportunity in rheumatoid arthritis: does it ever close? Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(5):793-794. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206993 By Carol Eustice Carol Eustice is a writer covering arthritis and chronic illness, who herself has been diagnosed with both rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. See Our Editorial Process Meet Our Medical Expert Board Share Feedback Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! What is your feedback? Other Helpful Report an Error Submit