Distinguishing Between New HIV Infections and Old Ones

Guidelines for universal HIV testing have existed for a long time now. However, many people do not get tested for HIV on a regular basis. That means that at the time someone is diagnosed with a new HIV infection, they may wonder if there is any way of knowing when they were infected or who infected them.

HIV Testing Form
Don Bayley / E+ / Getty Images

Diagnosing New and Old HIV Infections

There are several ways for doctors to determine whether a person who has been newly diagnosed as HIV positive is also newly infected. In rare cases, when testing is done very early, doctors will find people who test positive for viral RNA or the p24 antigen but who are not yet antibody positive. These are the individuals in the earliest stages of HIV infection. However, they will not be picked up on many standard antibody-based HIV tests. Therefore, such straightforward early HIV infection diagnoses are somewhat unusual.

More often, doctors are trying to determine whether a person who has tested positive on a standard HIV test is recently infected or not. These people already have antibodies against the virus. Therefore, their doctors are left to look at certain specific characteristics of those antibodies. These characteristics will be different in people with new HIV infections than in people with established HIV infections.

Antibody characteristics that doctors examine in order to detect incident HIV infections include:

  • The Type of Antibodies Present: Different isotypes of antibodies appear at different times after exposure to a pathogen. For many diseases can be useful for determining whether a person is newly infected or not. However, IgM antibodies which are usually used to detect new infections can also be present in people who have been infected with HIV for a while. Therefore, this is not always as useful for staging HIV infections as doctors might like. (This can, however, sometimes be used to distinguish between chronic and recent herpes infections.)
  • The Number of Antibodies Present: After antibodies first begin to appear in response to an HIV infection, they increase over a period of several months. Then they start leveling out. If these changes can be detected, it may be a sign of a relatively recent infection.
  • Which HIV Proteins the Antibodies Bind to: As HIV infection progresses, the relative amounts of antibodies to different HIV antigens changes. It is possible to use this to determine whether someone has an early or late HIV infection.
  • How Strongly Antibodies Bind to HIV: Newly HIV infected individuals generally have antibodies that bind less tightly to HIV than people with long-established infections. However, people who began treatment quite soon after infection may also have antibodies with similarly low avidity.

Standard HIV Testing Cannot Distinguish Between New and Old Infection

In conclusion, it is possible for doctors to determine if your new HIV diagnosis is the result of a new infection or an older infection. However, this information can not be determined by standard HIV testing. Determining whether a newly diagnosed infection is a new HIV infection is most often done by people working in HIV surveillance. It's not a normal part of patient care. Therefore, if you have recently been diagnosed as HIV positive and are concerned about when you seroconverted, you may need to talk to an infectious disease specialist about additional testing. Not every doctor will be aware of or have access to, the necessary technology.

In fact, most of the time, doctors will not do these forms of testing on newly diagnosed patients - even if they are requested. A patient is usually considered to have an acute (i.e. newly transmitted) infection only when they had been tested and found negative within the previous year. Newly diagnosed HIV positive patients who have not been tested on a regular basis are often simply unable to find out if they were recently infected.

It is worth mentioning that there are a few other circumstances in which individuals end up categorized as newly infected instead of just newly diagnosed.

  • If a person has anti-HIV antibodies and is RNA positive, but their Western blot is indeterminate. This is thought to be a sign of an acute infection. These cases may be caught through the confirmatory testing algorithms used to detect HIV.
  • When a person tests positive for viral RNA but doesn't yet produce anti-HIV antibodies. However, not all HIV testing includes an RNA test, so these cases are easily missed.

Why Detection of New HIV Infections Is Important

Diagnosing new HIV infections when they are still new is important. Doing so may significantly reduce the spread of HIV. For several reasons, people are at very high risk of transmitting HIV to their sexual partners in the weeks, months, or years before they know they are HIV positive.

The first reason that people with HIV may be more dangerous to their partners before they've tested positive is obvious. If they are unaware of their risk, they may be unmotivated to practice safer sex. The second is that newly infected individuals often have higher viral loads and are more infectious than people who have been infected for a long time. This makes the chance of passing on the virus higher during any particular encounter. The third is that if you haven't been tested, then you aren't being treated. Treatment greatly reduces the risk of infecting your partner. In fact, it is now used as a form of prevention. 

6 Sources
Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy.
  1. Peters PJ, Westheimer E, Cohen S, et al. Screening Yield of HIV Antigen/Antibody Combination and Pooled HIV RNA Testing for Acute HIV Infection in a High-Prevalence Population. JAMA. 2016;315(7):682-90. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0286

  2. Overbaugh J, Morris L. The Antibody Response against HIV-1. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a007039. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a007039

  3. Hurt CB, Nelson JAE, Hightow-weidman LB, Miller WC. Selecting an HIV Test: A Narrative Review for Clinicians and Researchers. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(12):739-746. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000719

  4. Volz EM, Ionides E, Romero-severson EO, Brandt MG, Mokotoff E, Koopman JS. HIV-1 transmission during early infection in men who have sex with men: a phylodynamic analysis. PLoS Med. 2013;10(12):e1001568. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001568

  5. Selik RM, Linley L. Viral Loads Within 6 Weeks After Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Early and Later Stages: Observational Study Using National Surveillance Data. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018;4(4):e10770. doi:10.2196/10770

  6. Cohen MS, Smith MK, Muessig KE, Hallett TB, Powers KA, Kashuba AD. Antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1 prevents transmission of HIV-1: where do we go from here? The Lancet. 2013;382(9903):1515-1524. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61998-4

By Elizabeth Boskey, PhD
Elizabeth Boskey, PhD, MPH, CHES, is a social worker, adjunct lecturer, and expert writer in the field of sexually transmitted diseases.