Cancer Leukemia What Are Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Subtypes? By Tom Iarocci, MD Tom Iarocci, MD LinkedIn Tom Iarocci, MD, is a medical writer with clinical and research experience in hematology and oncology. Learn about our editorial process Updated on February 17, 2021 Medically reviewed by Douglas A. Nelson, MD Medically reviewed by Douglas A. Nelson, MD LinkedIn Douglas A. Nelson, MD, is double board-certified in medical oncology and hematology. He was a physician in the US Air Force and now practices at MD Anderson Cancer Center, where he is an associate professor. Learn about our Medical Expert Board Print Table of Contents View All Table of Contents Subtypes vs. Staging Classifying Subtypes Diagnosing Subtypes Treating by Subtype Unlike many cancers that are diagnosed by stage (indicating how advanced the cancer is), acute myeloid (or myelogenous) leukemia (AML) is diagnosed based on genetic subtypes or specific genetic mutations; these help determine outlook and treatment. Subtypes are classified (grouped) based on the genetic changes underlying an individual's cancer. Recent advances in subtype classification have improved diagnostics, treatments, and survival rates over the past several years, providing a more hopeful outlook for a disease that has, historically, not always had a great prognosis. This article discusses staging versus subtypes and how healthcare providers classify, diagnose, and treat different AML subtypes. Albina Gavrilovic / Getty Images Symptoms of AML Symptoms of AML include: Fever Bone pain Lethargy and fatigue Frequent infections Easy bruising Unusual bleeding Subtypes vs. Staging When most cancers are diagnosed, they're "staged." The stage tells you how advanced the cancer is, determines your prognosis, and can guide treatment decisions. AML isn't staged. Instead, your outlook and treatment depend on your subtype, which is determined by lab tests. Most AML subtypes are defined in part by how developed and abnormal cancer cells look under a microscope when the disease is first diagnosed. Additionally, AML classification is now being augmented by new discoveries about genetic changes or mutations that are involved. Two AML classification systems are currently in use: The French-American-British (FAB) classificationThe World Health Organization (WHO) classification Further classification by complex genetic subtypes is evolving, thanks to a groundbreaking study published in 2016. Why Subtype Matters Knowing the genetic make-up of your leukemia can help your healthcare provider predict whether current treatments would be effective. This has already made more extensive genetic testing at the time of diagnosis routine. Understanding subtypes can also help researchers design new clinical trials to develop the best treatments for each AML type. Classifying AML Subtypes The FAB classification system has been around since the 1970s, but the subtyping process has changed a couple of times in recent years. The WHO classification system became standard in 2008, grouping people based on genetic changes that underlie their cancer (called "driver mutations"). Then, in 2016, pivotal research came out in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) that has taken subtyping even further. This study demonstrated that the WHO molecular classifications don't work well for nearly half of AML cases—48% of study participants couldn't be classified based on the WHO molecular groups, even though 96% of them did have driver mutations. Investigators have now begun reevaluating genomic classification of AML from the beginning, based on: The discovery of many new leukemia genesThe discovery of multiple driver mutations per patientComplex mutation patterns FAB Classification of AML More than 40 years ago, a group of French, American, and British leukemia experts divided AML into subtypes M0 through M7 based on the type of cell the leukemia develops from and how mature the cells are. M0 through M5 all start in immature forms of white blood cells. M6 starts in very immature forms of red blood cells. M7 starts in immature forms of cells that make platelets. SUBTYPE SUBTYPE NAME % OF AML DIAGNOSES PROGNOSIS VS. AML AVERAGE M0 Undifferentiated acute myeloblastic 5% Worse M1 Acute myeloblastic with minimal maturation 15% Average M2 Acute myeloblastic with maturation 25% Better M3 Acute promyelocytic (APL) 10% Best M4 Acute myelomonocytic 20% Average M4 eos Acute myelomonocytic with eosinophilia 5% Better M5 Acute monocytic 10% Average M6 Acute erythroid 5% Worse M7 Acute megakaryoblastic 5% Worse Source: Canaani et al. WHO Classification of AML The FAB classification system is still commonly used to group AML into subtypes; however, knowledge has advanced with respect to factors that influence prognosis and outlook for various types of AML. Some of these advances were reflected in the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) system, which divides AML into several groups: AML with myelodysplasia-related changesAML related to previous chemotherapy or radiationMyeloid sarcoma (also known as granulocytic sarcoma or chloroma)Myeloid proliferations related to Down syndromeAML with chromosomal translocations and inversionsAML not otherwise specifiedUndifferentiated and biphenotypic acute leukemias Groups 5, 6, and 7 are further broken down. AML With Chromosomal Translocations and Inversions In chromosomal translocations, a portion of the genetic material breaks off of its original location and re-attaches itself to a different chromosome. In inversions, a segment comes out, flips upside down, and reattaches to its original chromosome. At least seven types of AML include translocations, inversions, or similar genetic abnormalities. AML Not Otherwise Specified Cases of AML that don't fall into one of the above groups are classified similarly to the FAB system. FAB SUBTYPE WHO SUBTYPE NAME M0 AML with minimal differentiation M1 AML without maturation M2 AML with maturation M4 Acute myelomonocytic leukemia M5 Acute monocytic leukemia M6 Acute erythroid leukemia M7 Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia -- Acute basophilic leukemia -- Acute panmyelosis with fibrosis Undifferentiated and Biphenotypic Acute Leukemias These are leukemias that have both lymphocytic and myeloid features. They're sometimes called: Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) with myeloid markersAML with lymphoid markersMixed acute leukemias New Classifications: The NEJM Study The 2016 study that's prompted recent change included 1,540 people with AML. Researchers analyzed 111 genes known to cause leukemia, with the goal of identifying “genetic themes” behind the development of the disease. They found that participants could be divided into at least 11 major groups, each with different clusters of genetic changes, and with different disease characteristics and features. According to the study, most people had a unique combination of genetic changes driving their leukemia, which may help to explain why AML survival rates vary widely. Thus, the researchers worked to develop a new AML classification system using this emerging information. They concluded that three subgroups exist that weren't accounted for in the WHO classification system. They're called: Chromatin-spliceosomeTP53-aneuploidyIDH2R172 Using the proposed system to classify the 1,540 study participants: 1,236 people with driver mutations could each be classified into a single subgroup56 patients met the criteria for two or more subgroups166 people with driver mutations remained unclassified The authors recommended that, in the short term, five specific genetic types (called TP53, SRSF2, ASXL1, DNMT3A, and IDH2) should be incorporated into prognostic guidelines because they're common and strongly influence outcomes. Prognostic vs. Diagnostic The NEJM researchers called for two separate classification systems:One for use in diagnosing peopleOne for use in predicting outcomes (prognosis)They say the diagnostic system should be based on fixed properties while the prognostic system should change regularly based on available treatments. Newer Research Based largely on the NEJM study, other researchers have investigated certain genetic profiles of AML. According to studies published in 2020, some researchers have identified: Potential new early diagnostic methods for certain subtypesPotential new ways to identify people likely to be drug-resistantPotential new combinations of treatments for drug-resistant cases One study identified a new drug that researchers say is effective against drug-resistant AML subtypes and, once it's in use, "will have an immediate clinical impact." Diagnosing AML Subtypes Healthcare providers have a lot of tools for diagnosing AML and determining your subtype. Diagnosis starts with a physical exam. During your exam, they'll look for signs such as: Extensive bruisingBleedingInfectionAbnormalities in your eyes, mouth, liver, spleen, or lymph nodes To confirm a suspected AML diagnosis, they may order any combination of the following tests: Complete blood count (CBC) Bone marrow aspiration Bone marrow biopsy Lumbar puncture Imaging tests (e.g., X-ray, CT scan, MRI) Cytogenetics Cytogenetics and molecular testing is especially important for determining your subtype. It involves examining your cell's genetic material under a microscope to look for genetic abnormalities, such as translocations and inversions. Diagnosing Leukemia Subtypes and AML Treatment A wealth of new AML drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the past few years; however, those all were in development well before the 2016 research came out. Now, based largely on that research, numerous potential treatments currently are being studied for AML based on specific genetic subtypes. Several investigational drugs that target certain genetic mutations have begun the research process, and researchers are also looking at new types of chemotherapy medications, drug and antibody combinations, and drugs called kinase inhibitors. Some of these drugs are already on the market for other conditions, while others are showing promising results in trials. For example: Potential treatments for an AML mutation called TET2 may include drugs called PARP inhibitors or HMAs combined with vitamin C. A group of enzymes called KATs may help treat AML with mutations in genes called EP300 and CBP. Drugs called p300 activators are being investigated in animal models of AML. Several other AML genetic subtypes are being examined so researchers can figure out what drugs may target them. How Leukemia Is Treated A Word From Verywell Acute myeloid leukemia has always been a daunting diagnosis with a poor outlook. However, with new drugs available, more on the way, and constant new discoveries about genetic subtypes, the prognosis is improving and likely will continue to do so. 7 Sources Verywell Health uses only high-quality sources, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial process to learn more about how we fact-check and keep our content accurate, reliable, and trustworthy. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Bullinger L, et al. Genomic classification and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2209-2221. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1516192 American Cancer Society. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtypes and prognostic factors. Chen S, Chen Y, Lu J, et al. Bioinformatics analysis identifies key genes and pathways in acute myeloid leukemia associated with DNMT3A mutation. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9321630. Published 2020 Nov 23. doi:10.1155/2020/9321630 Estruch M, Reckzeh K, Vittori C, et al. Targeted inhibition of cooperative mutation- and therapy-induced AKT activation in AML effectively enhances response to chemotherapy [published online ahead of print, 2020 Dec 9]. Leukemia. 2020;10.1038/s41375-020-01094-0. doi:10.1038/s41375-020-01094-0 Jeon JY, Buelow DR, Garrison DA, et al. TP-0903 is active in models of drug-resistant acute myeloid leukemia. JCI Insight. 2020;5(23):e140169. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.140169 American Society of Clinical Oncology: Cancer.net. Leukemia - Acute myeloid - AML: Diagnosis. Watts J, Nimer S. Recent advances in the understanding and treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. F1000Res. 2018;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1196. doi:10.12688/f1000research.14116.1 Additional Reading Canaani J, Beohou E, Labopin M, et al. Impact of FAB classification on predicting outcome in acute myeloid leukemia, not otherwise specified, patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in CR1: An analysis of 1690 patients from the acute leukemia working party of EBMT. Am J Hematol. 2017;92(4):344-350. doi:10.1002/ajh.24640 By Tom Iarocci, MD Tom Iarocci, MD, is a medical writer with clinical and research experience in hematology and oncology. See Our Editorial Process Meet Our Medical Expert Board Share Feedback Was this page helpful? Thanks for your feedback! What is your feedback? Other Helpful Report an Error Submit By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Cookies Settings Accept All Cookies